Rush on Business Interactive Learning Environment Coming Soon

With the help of Doug Mitchell and Andy Brudtkuhl I will be going live with an Interactive Learning Environment to complement this blog very soon.   Rush on Business U will focus primarily on employment law, franchise due diligence  / investigation issues and business purchase or sale considerations.  I also hope to attract top speakers to participate in the process.  The online seminar presentations will include in-depth written materials, audio presentations, podcasts and possibly video.

Forums will also be available for you to share your insights and ask questions.  Similar to the blog format, I won't be able to answer questions regarding specific situations but we can discuss topics generally.

I welcome your comments and suggestions on topics you would like to hear more about.

Iowa Smoking Ban Begins July 1

Don't forget that Iowa's smoking ban in public places starts July 1, 2008.  If you are a business interested in learning more about compliance with the new law please visit the Iowa Department of Public Heath site at www.iowasmokefreeair.gov.

An informative Q & A concerning the smoking ban is available here.

Bar owners in particular are upset about the new law.  Is a challenge in the works?

 

 

 

photo on flickr by greefus groinks

 

Don't Copy Web Site Terms of Use Policies

Jonathan Frieden of the E-Commerce Law Blog offers some excellent advice that companies should refrain from copying another company's Web site terms of use policy.  Jonathan says that even sophisticated companies are tempted to reduce legal expenses by copying such policies.

Iowa intellectual property attorney Brett Trout has also offered the same advice.  As Brett pointed out in his post, an Iowa company looks pretty awkward explaining to a court why its dispute should be tried in Albuquerque.    

The bottom line is that even if you use standard terms of use policies and other online policies you will need some customization for your particular business needs.  Discuss with your lawyer whether he or she has standards forms that can be customized for your business.  Most eCommerce lawyers have such forms.  But it is a good practice to avoid directly copying the terms of use and other online policies of other companies.

 

Nascar Sexual Harassment Suit Shows Complaints Must Be Taken Seriously

Nascar has been sued by a former technical inspector in the Nationwide series.  The African-American woman seeks at least $225 million in her claims for sexual harassment, racial and gender discrimination and wrongful termination.  In the lawsuit, she alleged she was referred to as "Nappy Headed Mo" and "Queen Sheba," by co-workers, was often told she worked on "colored people time," and was frightened by one official who routinely made references to the Ku Klux Klan. In addition, she claims male co-workers made sexual advances, two of whom allegedly exposed themselves to her, and graphic and lewd jokes.

If true, those claims are indeed strong evidence of harassment and discrimination.  But what's worse is that her supervisor allegedly ignored her complaints and dismissed by saying that the guys were "former military guys" with a rough sense of humor and that she would just need to "deal with it".  Now, Nascar must "deal" with a huge lawsuit.  And in case they didn't notice, this predominately white and male sport is a fairly easy target in a case of this nature.

Nascar should have heeded several of my tips on how to avoid employment lawsuits.  Th two that quickly come to mind are to treat all employees with respect and to take action promptly to investigate when complaints occur.  If you are a supervisor in an organization where harassment or discrimination is suspected you had better not tell the employee to simply "deal with it".  That's going to get you sued every time. 

 

Build an Ark to Avoid Employment Lawsuits

In the film Evan Almighty everyone believes Evan has lost his mind when he begins building an ark next to his home to protect against an upcoming flood.  Right now, in Iowa, no one would proclaim him crazy.  Our recent flooding has once again wrecked havoc to homes and businesses throughout Iowa.  

So how do you build an ark to protect yourself from continually rising employment lawsuits?

1.  Treat Employees with Respect:  Seems like a basic philosophy but it is amazing how many employers forget to treat their employees with respect.  Employees that are humilated or treated in a disrespectful way are much more likely to sue your company. 

2.  Communicate with Your Employees:  First, make sure you have an effective employee handbook with up-to-date employment policies and publicize your policies to employees.  Make sure you follow your policies.  One of the easiest ways to land in an employee lawsuit is the failure to follow your employment policies.  Also make sure you have an open door policy where employees are allowed to voice their concerns or complaints.  Do not let complaints fester.  Deal with them right away.

3.  Implement an Effective Unlawful Discrimination and Harassment Policy:  Your harassment policy should include more than just sexual harassment.  There may be other forms of harassment based upon race, religion, age or disability.  It is also critical to consistently train employees and supervisors regarding unlawful harassment and discrimination.  You should consider training employees on harassment and discrimination issues at least once every year.

4.  Document, Document, Document:  The importance of good record keeping cannot be overstated.  If you don't have something in writing, chances are a jury or judge may not believe it happened.  Be sure to document even verbal warnings and maintain an appropriate personnel file in order to make sure the documentation is not lost. 

5.  Conduct Honest Employee Evaluations on a Regular Basis:  Unless your company is headquartered in Lake Wobegon every employee is probably not above average.  Evaluations can be valuable proof in an employment lawsuit.  Make sure poor performance is properly documented.  Otherwise, the judge or jury will not believe you when you say the employee performed poorly but all their evaluations are excellent.  You should conduct the evaluations on a regular basis, usually at least once per year.  I recently represented a client sued for discrimination.  A key in defending the case were the honest performance appraisals performed b management.

6. Do Not Retaliate:  Employers are often blindsided by retaliation claims.  There are a number of proactive measures you can take in order to avoid liability for retaliation claims.  It is important to avoid retaliation because recent cases have lowered the burden for plaintiffs to prove their retaliation claims and the number of retaliation claims from plaintiffs is continually on the rise.

7.  Take Action and Investigate Promptly: If a complaint arises, make sure you take the complaint seriously and investigate promptly.  A quick and thorough investigation may help eliminate problems before you have a real mess.  You will need to consider who should conduct the internal investigation.

8.  Compy with Wage and Hour Laws:  Ensure your exempt employees (i.e., salaried employees) are properly classified as exempt under the law.  Wage and hour claims are also on the rise and could result in a class action against your company.  This is a common area of the law that is ignored by many employers and could result in significant liability.

9.  Review and update your employee handbook and/or policies:  At least you should review your policies to incorporate any changes in the law or your manner of doing business.

These simple steps will go a long ways to reducing employee lawsuits.  To ensure that your company has done everything it can to avoid employee lawsuits, you should have your employment policies, training and practices reviewed by your employment lawyer.

*This post originally appeared as the Seven Ways to Avoid Employee Lawsuits from January of 2007 but this updated version is worth repeating.  It also includes some ideas from Anthony Zaller of the California Workforce Resource Blog who had commented on my original post. 

Photo on flickr by Whisper Photograhy.

 

 

Deadline for Filing Iowa Civil Rights Complaint Extended

Glad to see my friend Mark Landa blogging over on the Iowa Law Blog.  Mark has an important reminder that the time for filing a civil rights complaint under Iowa law will be extended from 180 days to 300 days in order to conform to the federal timeline.

Iowa employment lawyer Victoria Herring points out on her blog that it is not a good idea to push deadlines but the extended time frame will allow complainants (and employers) and additional time to work out a resolution or gather evidence for claims.

The new Iowa law goes into effect July 1, 2008.

Why Document Retention Policies Are So Critical

This post on employment lawsuits causing most e-discovery woes just confirms the reasons why a sound document retention policy is necessary in today's business environment.

Organizations need to respond to an increasing number of document requests, from regulatory compliance issues to internal investigations to full-scale litigation. Much of this information is available electronically. Despite the prevalence of such document requests most organizations remain reactive rather than proactive when it comes to dealing with the issue of electronic discovery.

Are you prepared?

Iowa's Legislature to Target Employers: Again?

This past January I posted on an Iowa immigration bill that targeted employers.  The bill sparked significant debate but was not passed.

Now in the wake of the raid at the AgriProcessors slaughterhouse and packing plant in Postville, Iowa, Iowa's legislative leaders are renewing promises to target employers.

This time legislative leaders will introduce legislation to prevent employers from hiring immigrant workers as independent contractors when they should be considered employees.  It is also anticipated the legislature will renew efforts to create sanctions on employers that knowingly hire undocumented workers.

I have written on the issues relating to employees and independent contractors on several occasions.  The issue of whether a worker is an employee or independent contractor is one of the most misunderstood (or should I say ignored) areas of the law.  The proposed legislation is likely to crack down on the use of illegal immigrants serving as independent contractors in the construction industry. 

In my experience a significant percentage of workers in the construction and other industries are misclassified as independent contractors rather than employees, not just illegal immigrants.  For most companies I would argue it's more about saving on payroll taxes and workers' compensation insurance than hiring undocumented illegal immigrants.    

As I have said in the past, the approach of misclassifying workers as independent contractors is not worth the risk.  The safest course is to treat workers as employees if the workers' status as an independent contractor could reasonably be questioned. 

If you have questions about whether to treat workers as employees or independent contractors be sure to consult with an employment lawyer.

Wall St. Journal and Law.com Share the Love

My most recent post on Love Contracts received some link love from the Wall St. Journal and Law.com's Legal Blog Watch.  It's nice to get a little recognition now and then from the heavyweights.

Be sure to check out employment lawyer Mark Toth's blog that was the source of my post.  He has one of the most informative and creative employment law blogs around.

Love Contracts in the Workplace

Mark Toth of the Manpower Employment Law Blog has an interesting post on "hooking up at work" and whether love contracts are a good idea.  This is where co-workers sign a contract in order to protect the company and the employees involved against sexual harassment or other discrimination charges.  Mark says he doesn't think the agreements are necessarily a good idea because it forces the company to become the love police and subordinates may claim that they were forced to sign such an agreements under duress when a superior is involved.

Other employment lawyers quoted in the Newsweek article featuring Mark believe the love contracts may be a good idea.  However, I tend to agree with Mark.  Sure certain office-romance relationships may start out consensual but it can quickly turn to harassment when one of the lovers calls it quits and the other won't give up the pursuit.  I tend to believe that the changed circumstances and conduct that occurred after the relationship broke off still opens the company up to liability - love contract or no love contract. 

CSI: Des Moines

Tomorrow's BIZ networking luncheon features Jonni Tonnemacher, a CPA specializing in fraud detection services.  Learn how to identify fraud in your business and implement controls to prevent fraud from occurring.

I have not heard Jonni talk previously but the topic is fascinating.  It is downright scary how much fraud occurs in business.  Don't be a victim.  Be informed.

Read more about the offerings of BIZ at www.bizci.org.

Business Purchase Offer: Time to Seek Legal Advice is Before Signing Offer

I am frequently involved with the purchase and/or sale of a business.  Often the purchaser discovers the business through a business broker.  In the Des Moines area, it seems as though several of the business brokers convince prospective buyers to make an offer before seeking legal advice or reviewing the basic terms before the offer is signed. (i.e. price, financing terms, earn-out, non-compete, etc.).  The selling point is that the broker's form offer to purchase makes the agreement contingent upon review by professionals including a lawyer and/or accountant. 

While the contingency is a good one, the problem is that it does not replace a consultation with a lawyer or accountant before the offer is made.  The simple reason is that once the offer is made it creates a binding agreement.  If you fail to consult the lawyer before signing the offer the basic terms of the sale are complete.  At that point, the lawyer may be able to help you with the legal wording in the final contract but it is awfully tough to change the terms of the deal.

So if you are purchasing a business be sure to consult a business lawyer before signing the offer.  Don't fall for the notion that a contingency permitting legal professionals to review the agreement will allow you to change the terms of deal in the final agreement.  Once you sign the offer it is probably too late.

 

Iowa LLC Law has Key Changes

In his new blog, Marc Ward of the Dickinson Law Firm, sets out some key changes to the new Iowa LLC Act.  One important issue to remember is that by default under the current law, Iowa LLCs are member managed unless unless the articles of organization or the operating agreement provides for management by manager(s).  Under the new law only a provision in the operating agreement can change the management of the LLC from member-managed to manager-managed.  As Marc indicates:

The operating agreement must expressly provide that (a) the LLC is "manager-managed" (b) the LLC is "managed by managers" (c) management of the LLC is "vested in managers" or (d) words of similar import.  Be safe, use one of the first three phrases recognized by the Act to avoid all doubt.

But even perhaps more importantly, the new law (effective Jan. 2009) provides that a member is not an agent that can bind the LLC just because they are a member.  The LLC may also file a statement of authority with the Iowa Secretary of State that specifically sets forth who does or does not have authority to act for the LLC to execute an instrument transferring real property or to enter into transactions on  behalf of or otherwise act for or bind the LLC.

Hat tip to Joe Kristan for pointing out Marc's blog.  For those that doubt the validity of social media, it's kind of funny that I learned my neighbor was blogging through someone else's blog post. 

 

Writing the Better Contract from Anita Campbell- Part II

Former general counsel and small business owner, Anita Campbell, offers sage advice in her post on the Build a Solo Practice Blog about how to write a better contract .  What is the better contract in Anita's view?

  1. First and foremost, the better contract protects the client.
  2. The better contract is written in plain English.  (A novel concept indeed!)
  3. The better contract is written for a 12th grade education or lower.
  4. The better contract incorporates standardization.

A word of caution concerning standardization of contracts:  Clients will often take a standardized contract and fail to adapt it appropriately for the current business transaction.  Clients should be reminded that it is a good idea to have the business lawyer review the agreement to make sure it adequately protects the client in the current transaction, contains the actual terms of the current transaction and fulfills the goals of the current transaction.  I can't tell you how many times I have seen the embarassing situation where a business person took a standardized contract and failed to revise it appropriately for the situation.  It happens often when people pilfer agreements from the Internet and fail to modify the terms.  If litigation occurs, the result of this carelessness could be a verdict against the client.

Anita's solution involves providing a set of instructions to the client along with the standarized contract.  Included in the instruction sheet is the direction to have the business manager consult the corporate lawyer before signing or implementing the agreement.  This may work well with organizations that have in-house counsel but is probably less intuitive for businesses with outside counsel.  I offer the reminder to always have contracts reviewed by your business lawyer.

Hat tip to Susan Cartier Liebel and her Build a Solo Practice Blog.  Susan is passionately building one of the best blogs in the country.  Notice I didn't limit it to legal related blogs either.

 

How to Write Contracts for Business People

Anita Campbell of Small Business Trends shares her thoughts about how to avoid the contract from hell on the Build a Solo Practice site. 

As a former general counsel and now a small business owner, Anita has been on both sides of the fence when it comes to contracts.  According to Anita, here are some things to avoid in your next contract:

  • Too much legalese.
  • Using adverbs like "whereas" and "heretofore".  It's kind of like using "COMES NOW" for pleadings.  Does anyone really talk like that?
  • More than 5-7 defined terms.
  • Attaching multiple exhibits.  I can speak from experience that multiple exhibits is a real pain for the drafter so I can't imagine what it is like for the reader.
  • Making it so hard to understand that it leads to avoidable litigation just because no one can understand it.

 

Notify Insurers Immediately About Claims

In a recent blog post, Daniel Schwartz of the Connecticut Employment Law Blog reminds employers just how important it is to notify insurers under their employment practices liability insurance.

This advice is not just critical in the employment context.  It is vital for every type of insurance your business may have.  If a claim occurs be sure to notify your insurer immediately.  The failure to do so may result in a denial of coverage.

Thanks to Daniel for the reminder.

Overdocumentation in Employment Cases

In last week's Tip of Week (yes, I am a little behind), John Phillips of the Word on Employment Law raises the interesting perspective that it is possible to overdocument in employment cases.

Some of John's warnings on overdocumentation include:

  • Documentation on trivial matters.
  • Creating a paper trail right before an employee is terminated.
  • Documenting conduct or performance issues for an employee when you have not done the same for others.
  • Summarizing in a document right before an employee is terminated all the things you wanted to document when the conduct occurred but didn't.
  • Preparing documentation after the employee is terminated.

Granted, John's point is well taken.  It is important to be fair and consistent in the documentation of employee performance and conduct.  Employees should be treated in a consistent manner and it is best to document performance and conduct as it occurs. 

However, I am not sure I necessarily agree that it is best to go forward without any documentation at all when the documentation has not been done right away.  It depends on the circumstances.  There are times when a summary of events written after the fact may be helpful.  Much of this also depends on the way the document is written.  And of course I would never advocate that anyone fabricate evidence.  

Please consult your employment lawyer for advice in a particular situation.   

Take This One to the Bank: F-Bombs in Depo Are Bad Idea

The Dickinson Law Firm's Iowa Banking Law Blog ignores its disclaimer and provides some legal advice:

F-Bombs in a deposition are a bad idea!

It's just another subprime market meltdown.  One F-bomb is a mistake.  Two might be forgiven.  But 73?  That's gonna get you sanctioned every time.

 

Evaluate the Strength of a Franchisor

Are you considering a franchise business?  Read this blog post on evaluating the strength of your franchisor before signing on from the First Prize Franchise blog.

Time and time again I see people invest their life savings into franchise operations.  Some of these people achieve great results but others do not.  There is no validity to the claim that franchise operations are less likely to fail than non-franchise operations.  One critical aspect to consider in my view is the brand itself.  Is the brand recognizable?  If not, the franchise better have a fantastic system, unique concept or protected intellectual property.  Otherwise, I think you need to question whether the franchise is right for you.

Electronic Workplace: Dangers & Pitfalls

Today I will present at the Central Iowa SHRM monthly meeting located at Copper Creek Golf Course on electronic workplace issues. The electronic workplace is all around us. Computers, voice mail, internet, intranet, e-mail, fax machines, laptops, PDAs, videoconferencing, social media, blogs and more are common features in the American workplace. The development of the electronic workplace has not come without legal implications. The same technology that allows us to perform work more efficiently creates several twists on several areas of employment law. We will explore many of the dangers and pitfalls in the electronic workplace:

I. Email

  • Discovery in Litigation
  • Record Retention
  • Discrimination, harassment and other concerns

II. Internet

  • Accessing Inappropriate Material
  • Social Media and Blogs
  • Copyright violations

III. Employee Privacy Rights

  • Electronic Communications Privacy Act
  • Handbooks - lower expectation of privacy
  • Consistency

IV. Telecommuting

  • ADA
  • Workers' Compensation

V.  Employment Ads and Resume Posting on Internet

Program details:  Tuesday, April 8, 2008 at Copper Creek Golf Course, 4825 Copper Creek Drive, Pleasant Hill, Iowa.  Registration begins at 7:15 a.m. Business Meeting begins at 7:40 a.m. Program begins at 8:00 a.m.

1.0 General recertification credit has been pre-approved.

Thanks to the Central Iowa SHRM Chapter for the invitation.

Pizza Hut: A Tough Employment Situation Any Way You Slice It

The Des Moines Register had an article about how support has poured in for a Pizza Hut Delivery driver that was suspended from work after he shot an alleged armed robber.  The employee had a valid handgun permit but a Pizza Hut human resources representative indicated that employees are not allowed to carry guns "because we (Pizza Hut) believe that is the safest for everybody."

I saw a clip where the delivery driver spoke with the TV media and he was obviously shaken by the incident.  He said he appreciated the fact his employer had given him the time off without automatically taking action against him. 

I know many readers on the Register blogs have been critical of Pizza Hut but they appear to be handling this difficult situation rather cautiously.  They have not terminated the driver at this time but rather have suspended the employee pending an investigation. 

Public opinion is definitely in favor of the driver.  Even a state senator has publicly stated his position that the company would be wrong to fire the driver and vows to stop buying Pizza Hut products if the driver is fired.  So this is a tough one for the company and there are no easy answers.  I don't envy the employer's position on this one. 

Ultimately I suspect the employer will enforce its policy but I will let you know as this unfolds.

photo on flickr by hashcakes.

 

 

 

What You Need to Know About Retaliation Claims

Pennsylvania employment lawyer Michael Moore has an excellent post on Five Things Every HR Generalist Should Know about Retaliation Claims.  Michael notes that the number of retaliation claims rose 18% in 2007 to a record high, doubling since 1992.  His post covers the following areas:

  • What is unlawful retaliation?
  • What is "Adverse Action" by an employer?
  • What is "Protected Activity by an employee?
  • Promptly investigate comments & complaints regarding discrimination.
  • Monitor supervisors for adverse action following an employee complaint.

In my experience, employers are usually cognizant of discrimination and harassment claims. However, they are often blindsided by retaliation claims. The successful resolution of a discrimination or harassment complaint means you are only halfway home. Supervisors and employees must not retaliate against the employee who complained. This is especially important because of a United States Supreme Court decision lowering the burden for employees to show retaliation.

Here are some proactive measures employers can take in order to avoid retaliation claims:

  1. Make sure your employee handbook includes a policy prohibiting retaliation.
  2. Always have alternative reporting avenues.
  3. Conduct supervisor and management training on harassment, discrimination and retaliation. 
  4. Make sure supervisors and management have been asked the tough questions when it comes to employee discipline. Make sure the discipline has nothing to do with the complaints of harassment, discrimination or retaliation. 
  5. Periodically talk with the complaining employee to determine if anyone has retaliated against them. If performance is an issue for the employee be sure to bring this to the attention of the employee and make sure to document your conversations. Document! Document! Document!

As always, be sure to consult your employment lawyer for advice in specific situations.

Today's Lawyers Must Be Mindful of Social Media and Pretrial Publicity

Des Moines attorney Charles Kenville has a great post on the need for lawyers to be mindful of the new media exposure in their cases.  Chuck has a criminal law bent to his post but his reminder is just as true for civil cases.

I know from experience that savvy businesses are acutely aware of blogs and other social media in their trial preparation.  In particular, Microsoft did a great job a staying in contact with Des Moines patent attorney Brett Trout and I when the Microsoft-Iowa litigation was going full steam.  But the plaintiffs were not to be outdone.  We routinely received updates from the plaintiffs' public relations team as well.

The bottom line is that lawyers engaging in trial law today ignore blogs and social media at their peril.  Learn how to read RSS feeds to stay on top of pretrial publicity.  You will be glad you did.

Should Employers Allow Employees to Start Businesses?

Seeds I read a Des Moines Register article this past week on a young man who is starting a business while employed by another company.  According to the SBA deputy director in Iowa this happens frequently.  I must say that I greatly admire anyone who has the courage and desire to start their own business. But my question is whether this is good for employers?

This is not an easy question.  On the one hand it is important for an employee to grow and allowing an employee to create a business on his or her own time may in fact create a more productive and happy employee.  Particularly if the employee is starting a business that is different than the employer and they do it on their own time there may be no harm.

On the other hand, an employer pays an employee to do their job.  The employee's allegiance should be to the employer as long as that employee is receiving wages and other job benefits, right?

I must confess that I am not sure whether there is a right answer and it probably depends on the circumstances.  I am aware of many successful companies that draft policies that prohibit outside business activities while many other successful companies provide an environment that encourages employees to start their own companies.

One important risk in allowing employees to start businesses while on the employer's dime is the potential for the employer to start a similar business and steal clients.  This should be prevented.  One way to do this is with a non-compete agreement.  Other ways employers can protect themselves is through the use of confidentiality and non-solicitation agreements

But employers may want to read this article on what to do when an employee betrays you.  Unfortunately, many employees are not as upfront and honest as the young man in the Register article.  Employees have a legal obligation to act in the employer's best interests.  If an employee breaches this duty an employer may have an enforceable right.

Photo on flickr by Burpee Gardens.

A Must Read: Cautionary Tale About Partnership

A cautionary tale about partnership from Richard Fox on the Kauffman eVenturing site is an absolute must read.  Fox shares how he thought his legal background would protect him well as he created shareholder agreements, buy/sell agreements, voting trusts, special bylaws and articles of incorporation when he entered into a business partnership.  But even he was surprised when a 50 percent partner tried to sell the company out from underneath him after his father's funeral.  To make matters worse the partner tried to sell the company to their number one competitor.

Fortunately for Fox he was able to ultimately sell the company for a handsome price because he continued to concentrate on building the business rather than retaliating against his partner.  But it's pretty clear Fox believes any business person should be extremely careful when taking on partner.  He offers the following priceless advice (with my comments following):

  • Know Your Existing Shareholders' Rights. Shareholders of private companies—even minority shareholders—hold the same legal rights as shareholders of public companies. When you accept shareholders, you accept the same scrutiny that comes with being a public company without the benefits. Understand that you can never be adequately prepared for a shareholder who wants to maliciously assert their shareholder rights to cause you problems. 

(Comment:  In Iowa, all shareholders are entitled to the financial information of the company as well as copies of all corporate documents   I strongly suggest you keep all copies of all important corporate documents and financial information routinely, not just when you need them.  In particular make sure you have any documents that would evidence ownership rights.  It is my experience that often one partner will have access to the corporate documentation while the other partner does not.  Don't let that happen to you).

  • Avoid Taking on New "Legal" Shareholders. Entrepreneurs sometimes give ownership interests to key employees to allow them to share in the equity growth of the business. For the reason stated immediately above, you might consider offering "phantom stock," (read this article for more on phantom stocks) which carries all the economic benefits of common stock ownership without the potentially abusive rights of legal ownership. A lawyer should be able to advise you on the details. 

(Comment:  My experience with clients is that most employees really want to be paid more.  I know entrepreneurs often want employees to feel as though they have a "piece of the action".  But I also caution you to think twice about employee ownership).

  • Take the high road. Rather than counter-suing the partner, Fox chose to put his energy into building the business. Not only was it good for the business, but it kept from muddying the waters any further and made a much needed ally out of the company's other corporate director. 

 (Comment:  This is very difficult to do is some situations.  Sometimes you may have no alternative but to fight back.  But I agree it is critical to continue growing the business). 

  • Be prepared for anything. Pushed to the edge, some people will fight back with extreme measures. Although secretly passing legislation is extreme, be prepared for the unexpected.

(Comment:  I have learned this lesson the hard way myself with business partners in a few of my endeavors.  Do everything you can to protect yourself.  Start by knowing your rights and make sure to document, document, document.  Adversity often brings out the worst in people but amazingly people also change with substantial success.  Researchers have found the mere presence of money changes peopleIt is also a good idea to have a trusted confidant that can help you vet a potential partnership without emotion).

  • Sell on your way up. Entrepreneurs are "hard-wired" to grow businesses. The idea of selling is usually a far-away concept that is considered, but knowing the best time to sell is not intuitive. Don't wait until you can see the peak because chances are your buyers can see it too and will discount the price accordingly. Plan on a full year for the sale process to be completed; if you pull the trigger too late, you may miss.

(Comment:  This is a tough one for most business people.  You need to have a little luck on your side to sell at the right time.  But it's just like investing in the stock market.  You will likely never sell at the peak so don't be greedy.  A business sale should be a win-win for the buyer and seller). 

Overall, I just can't stress enough the importance of carefully considering whether a business partnership is right for you.  I often joke that it is not a matter of "if" but a matter of "when" the partnership will end.  But this is one joke I don't consider to be a laughing matter.  Fox's tale proves it.   

Rush Nigut Joins Brick Gentry, P.C. Law Firm

Today is my last day with the Sullivan & Ward law firm.  This coming Monday I am taking a hop, skip and a jump over to the law firm of Brick Gentry, P.C. in West Des Moines, Iowa.  This is actually almost literally true as the Brick Gentry law firm is located across the parking lot just to the west of my current office location. 

It is difficult to leave my friends at the Sullivan & Ward firm but I am excited by this new opportunity.  Brick Gentry is a growing law firm with an excellent reputation in the Des Moines legal community for over 40 years.  The firm now consists of approximately twenty-five lawyers practicing in a wide range of areas including business law, municipal law, health care law, employment law, litigation and real estate.   

I'll join the firm as a shareholder and continue to work with my current business law clients and litigation matters.  Rush on Business will also continue although you will notice some changes to the links and contact information on the blog in the next couple of days. 

My new contact information is:

Rush Nigut, Brick Gentry, P.C., 6701 Westown Parkway, Suite 100, West Des Moines, IA 50266.  Phone:  515-274-1450; Fax:  515-274-1488; email:  rush.nigut@brickgentrylaw.com

Thank you again to all of you that read this blog.  I appreciate your support and look forward to this next step in the journey.  Stay tuned for more because I have a few plans ahead to mix it up and enhance the blog.  I'll need to settled in but I am looking forward to working on some new challenges very soon. 

photo on flickr by phxpma

 

 

Is Blogging Hazardous for Your Career?

As a blogger you may want to read this post from the Write Stuff on how to protect your online reputation

The post discusses how several employees have been fired from their jobs for writing controversial blog posts including a Web designer that shared stories and opinions about co-workers on a personal blog, an airline attendant who posted photos of herself in an empty jet, and the former CNN reporter who published opinionated entries on his blog.

As pointed out:

In each instance, the blogger’s justifications and legal arguments may be compelling. But that doesn’t change the fact that they all have one thing in common: Termination from lucrative positions that permanently clouds their employment histories.

The post goes on to give some great reminders including

  • Blog as if your employer is watching and behave accordingly.
  • Don't mix business and personal matters.
  • Research company employee handbooks and/or consult HR before blogging.
  • Consider what you stand to gain against what you stand to lose.
  • If you are monetizing your blog check your company's conflict of interest policy.
  • Blog truthfully and accurately.

Above all, whether you are blogging on a personal or business blog, you must be cognizant of whether your words and actions could damage and/or embarass your employer.  If so, you shouldn't be surprised when you receive your pink slip. 

And also always remember the shortest corporate blogging policy:  "Be professional".

Interview Tips to Live By

I don't know a single employer that can't use some good interview tips.  Fortunately for us Ohio Employer attorney Jon Hyman shares how to avoid hidden interview traps  and common stereotypes to avoid during job interviews.

These are great posts so be sure to check them out.

Deleted Email Case Provides Important Lessons

The Electronic Discovery Blog of K & L Gates has an informative post on a recent electronic discovery decision out of the Northern District of Georgia. 

In the case the court found that deleted emails were not reasonably accessible and the defendant had no duty to search backup tapes for emails of a sexual nature.

Lessons from this decision:

  1. DIscovery requests for emails should be relevent, specific and limited by time, sender and recipient.
  2. Following a written document retention and destruction schedule can prevent spoilation sanctions.
  3. Plaintiffs should request company-wide email perservation and not rely solely on the fact litigation has commenced.  Requests should also include the names of individuals from whom you want the emails.
  4. If the costs of retrieving emails on backup tapes are too high, judges are reluctant to order production.

Read the entire decision here.

 

Retailer: Make Sure You're Covered By Insurance

Brian Honnold of Professional Solutions Insurance Services shares important information on IowaBiz that every retailer should know about their insurance coverage when you build out your new retail space in your local mall or strip center.

If you don't fully check out your coverages chances are you will be sorry.

 

 

Key Differences Between UFOC and New Franchise Disclosure Document

As disclosed in the last post the new amended FTC rule concerning franchise disclosure documents requires franchisors to update their UFOC by no later than July 1, 2008.  After July 1, 2008, franchisors must comply with the new FTC rule only.  Currently, franchisors may comply with either the former rule or the new rule.

Here are some key differences between the former rule and the new rule:

  • Use of unaudited financial statements.  Start-up franchisors may phase-in the use of audited financial statements.  In this case the franchisor must clearly and conspicuously disclose that the franchise has not been in business for three or more years and cannot include all required financial statements.  (There may still be requirements to submit audited opening balance sheets in registration states).  Franchisees should make sure to review the financials carefully as always.
  • Financial Statements.  The FTC will allow the use of financial statements prepared according to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP").  There must be separate audited financial statements for any parent that "commits to perform post-sale obligations for the franchisor or guarantees the franchisor's obligations" in the disclosure document.
  • No Broker Disclosures.  The Amended FTC rule eliminates the broker disclosure requirement.  However, the broker will need to be listed on the Receipt Page because the Receipt Page requires the franchisor to identify all "franchise sellers".
  • Litigation.  Franchisors will be required to disclose material franchisor-initiated litigation against its franchisees.  The rule will be more lenient as a franchisor will only have to disclose actions that the franchisor filed during its last fiscal year - not the last 10 years. Further,  a full description of the case will not be necessary.  If a counterclaim is filed against a franchisee the disclosure will need to be treated as any other franchisee-initiated action and the regular, full disclosure will be required.  (Franchisees will need to more fully investigate whether franchisor-initiated litigation occurred whether it is in the disclosure document or not).
  • Financial Performance Representations.  The new rule encourages franchisors to provide financial performance representations but it is still voluntary.  Franchisors may provide a more detailed cost and expense analysis which could be helpful for prospective franchisees.  Also, franchisors may provide financial representations based upon a subset that shares the same characteristics. 

There are other differences so be sure to talk with an attorney experienced in franchise matters if you are looking at purchasing a franchise.

 

New Proposed FMLA Regulations

The Department of Labor recently released new proposed regulations concerning the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA).  Since the proposed regulations are 477 pages, it is nice that Ohio employment lawyer Jon Hyman has provided a excellent overview.

Jon simply has one of most informative employment law blogs around.  Here are his highlights of the new regulations:

Except in emergency situations, employees will be required to follow the employer's policy for notification of FMLA leave, eliminating employees' ability under the old regulations to take up to 2 days after an absence begins to notify their employer that they intend to take FMLA leave. This change will greatly improve employers' ability to plan and schedule around employees' medical leaves.

  • Employers will be able to directly contact employees' doctors when employers have questions about FMLA medical certification forms that the doctors have filled out. Employers will no longer have to go through the employee as an intermediary, or retain their own doctor to contact the employee's doctor. While this change may have some effect on employee privacy, it will greatly improve the flow of information and streamline the ability of employers to make proper decisions based on full and complete medical information. This rule will also eliminate the expense and burden of companies having to retain their own doctors simply to ensure that a form is properly filled out.
  • To employers' dismay, the regulations do not change the time increments in which employees can take intermittent leave, but do require that an employee using intermittent leave use the employer's regular call in procedure except in emergencies. Thus, employees will still be able to take intermittent leave in very short increments, continuing for employers the administrative nightmare of intermittent leave, albeit with some additional notice.
  • Employers will be entitled to require employees to obtain certification of FMLA-eligible medical conditions twice a year instead of annually.
  • Currently, the clock under which employees accrue their 12 months of service for eligibility has no time limit, even after multiple breaks of service. Thus, if I work for 6 months for a company, and return 10 years later, I am eligible for FMLA leave after another 6 months. The new regulations place a 5-year cap on years of service for calculating eligibility, except for military or childrearing leaves, or where rehiring is covered by a collective bargaining agreement.

Please note that I often find many small employers mistakenly believe they are subject to the FMLA regulations.  Generally, the FMLA covers employers with 50 or more employees, and employees must have worked for the employer for 12 months and for 1,250 hours of service during the previous year to be eligible for FMLA leave.  So be sure not to create a situation where you are responsible for FMLA leave if you are not required to do so.

As always, seek the advice of an employment lawyer in your particular situation.

flickr photo by mahalie

Blawg Review #147

Welcome to a RAGBRAI inspired Blawg Review.  What is RAGBRAI?  The Register's Annual Great Bicycle Ride Across Iowa is an annual seven-day ride across the state.  Heading into its 36th year, RAGBRAI is the longest, largest and oldest touring bicycle ride in the world.  It's not a race.  It's an experience.   And since Blawg Review is a carnival, nothing says carnival in an uniquely Iowa way like bicycles, spandex, pork chops, pie, frivolity and 10,000 of your closest friends!

The weather in Iowa is frigid this winter.  As the weekend of this Blawg Review approaches Iowans brace for another heavy snow.  Our friend Charlie Longbrief looks at the floor below his stationary bike and dreams of summer.  A person can stand only so many YMCA spinning classes.  He thinks back to his first RAGBRAI as a twenty year old when law school hadn't yet entered his mind and the biggest celebrity on the ride was Oakland Raiders great and Miller Lite spokeman Ben Davidson.  Now it's nothing to see the likes of lawyer turned politician John Edwards or the bicycling legend himself, Lance Armstrong.  Armstrong may have participated in the famous New York City Marathon but his heart will always belong with RAGBRAI.  Listen for yourself:

Day 1:  Missouri Valley to Harlan  - 58 miles

This year's ride starts in the river town of Missouri Valley.  While performing the traditional dip of his back tire in the Missouri River, Charlie sees Liz Overton of the Iowa Law Blog who warns him that because of the $350,000 settlement in a 2004 RAGBRAI death bicyclers better beware of the new proposed legislation from the Iowa State Association of Counties.

Unfazed Charlie gets on his bike and sets out on his adventure.  But as he rides off he does ask himself whether Mad Kane is right.  Is it wise to travel with friends particularly where tents are involved?

About 15 miles down the road Charlie takes a break and starts getting an earful from New Yorker Eric Turkewitz about how State Farm has been hit with a RICO lawsuit over alleged sham medical exams.  That hasn't been reported elsewhere and Charlie worries whether State Farm might be doing the same thing in Iowa.  Charlie is so interested he and Eric ride the rest of the way to Harlan together.  Although its only the first day Turkewitz remarks that he agrees with Lance Armstrong . . . RAGBRAI is a hell of lot more fun than his beloved New York City Marathon.

As he pulls into Harlan, Charlie finds himself a little short on cash and heads off to find an ATM.  There he sees John Crenshaw who starts telling him about the biggest scams banks are pulling off everyday. Charlie just shakes his head in agreement as he pays the $2.00 charge to get the money out of the ATM.  After a little angel hair pasta its time to hit the sleeping bag.  There is a big week ahead and unfortunately Charlie isn't twenty any longer.

Day 2:  Harlan to Jefferson - 83 miles

The next morning Charlie wakes up bright and early and sets off for Jefferson.  He has some clients that are buying a business nearby and that reminds him he should heed Larry Staton Jr.'s advice to know what you are getting when you buy a trademark from an existing business.

About half way to Jefferson our city boy is a little mesmerized by the miles and miles of corn.  It makes him wonder whether Farmer David will be able to pay that large patent judgment he now owes Monsanto as reported by the Patent Baristas.

In Scranton, just short of Jefferson, Charlie sees a big group of people gathered in a park off the town's main drag.  There he sees Dan Slater of the WSJ Law Blog who explains that all the hoopla is because the M & M boys have turned their attention to the RAGBRAI water slides because the Naked Cowboy drove them outta of Dodge.  The revelers love it and the log jam causes a very slow ride into Jefferson that evening.

Day 3:  Jefferson to Ames - 56 miles

It's a big day for politicians on the way to Ames, home of Iowa State University.  Barack Obama and John McCain are expected to make appearances today.  Hillary Clinton is here too and keeps talking about how the Florida and Michigan delegates must count.  Obama shrugs it off by saying even his six year old knows it wouldn't be fair to count votes where there was no campaign.  But at least Florida has made significant strides in improving its jury system according to Juries.  While Diane Levin points out voters can learn a lot from the field of negotiationEugene Volokh shares that John Mellencamp may be able to stop McCain from playing his songs after all.

All the political talk has people addressing serious issues on the road today.  Riding on a three person tandum, Leon Gettler of Sox First tells Charlie that Sarbanes-Oxley not only failed to stop the subprime meltdown, it contributed by giving investors the false confidence that they could rely on the law, and not prudence to protect their market holdingsScott Greenfield shares that Congress has a pending bill that may immunize banks from paying billions in dollars to a small Plano, Texas companyPatently-O adds that although DataTreasury is not directly mentioned in the bill it is pretty clear that Section 14 is directed primarily at the company

As Charlie rides into Ames he sees Kevin O'Keefe and  Holden Oliver of What About Clients engaged in a heated discussion about whether corporate clients really want a lawyer that blogs.  O'Keefe says yes while Oliver says no.  It then gets a little personal when O'Keefe accuses Oliver of being someone else.  Charlie blames Teri Rasmussen who started the whole thing when she said every client should want a lawyer who blawgs.

Day 4:  Ames to Tama-Toledo - 75 miles

Charlie gets ready to head off to Iowa's version of the twin cities today.  In the pancake breakfast line he meets Connie Crosby who is kind enough to introduce him to David Bilinsky.  David tells Charlie all about how there is a great need for law firms to turn their senior partners into business leadersDavid Maister overhears them and chimes in that