Buying a Business: Do Your Homework Because "Low-Risk" Doesn't Exist

I recently received an email from a business brokerage advertising their services.  In the email the brokerage said they have "low-risk" businesses and franchises for sale. While that may make for good marketing - I must unfortunately say that "low-risk" businesses do not exist in my opinion. If our struggling economy has shown us anything, it has demonstrated that risk is inherent in business. To advise otherwise minimizes the enormity of the decision to purchase a business.

Now don't get me wrong. I am not knocking the business brokerage. It's their job to sell businesses and that's just what they are attempting to do. But the prospective buyer should be more cautious and take the time to understand the inherent risks of ownership in the business you intend to buy.  It is absolutely critical to conduct due diligence. Appropriate due diligence includes examination of the following areas in the business:

  • Organizational documents and good standing with state and/or federal authorities
  • Financial information
  • Physical assets
  • Real Estate
  • Intellectual property
  • Employees and employee benefits
  • Licenses and permits
  • Environmental issues
  • Taxes
  • Material contracts
  • Product and service lines
  • Customer information
  • Litigation
  • Insurance Coverage
  • Professionals
  • Articles and publicity

See this due diligence checklist for more details.  It is a very comprehensive checklist.  The level of due diligence will likely vary with the size of the business transaction but this list should give you a good outline of the issues to consider. 

 

Don't Expect to "Get Out" of a Franchising Agreement

In this current economic downturn many people will lose their jobs.  Many of those individuals will turn to franchising as a form of business ownership instead of opting for another position in the corporate world.  While franchising may be a legitimate option for some, it is important for prospective franchisees to remember that it is not often very easy to get out of a franchise agreement.  Investing in a franchise is not a decision to take lightly.

A typical franchise agreement may last anywhere from 5-10 years and have options for renewal.  Often franchisees mistakenly believe they can get out of the franchise agreement if things go bad.  The reality is that the written franchise agreement usually remains in force and often the franchisor has rights to sue the franchisee for lost royalties if the franchisee does not pay.  Not to mention potential problems you will have with your lease and/or other contracts.

So before you buy a franchise follow these steps as outlined on the FTC Website:

  • Study the disclosure document and proposed contract carefully.
  • Interview current owners in person. (They should be listed in the disclosure document.) Visiting them in person may help you identify any that are "shills" — people paid to give favorable reports. Don't rely on a list of references selected by the company because it may contain shills. Ask owners and operators how the information in the disclosure document matches their experiences with the company.
  • Investigate claims about your potential earnings. Some companies may claim that you'll earn a certain income or that existing franchisees or business opportunity purchasers earn a certain amount. Companies making earnings representations must provide you with the written basis for their claims. Be suspicious of any company that does not show you in writing how it computed its earnings claims.
  • Sellers also must tell you in writing the number and percentage of owners who have done as well as they claim you will. Keep in mind that broad sales claims about successful areas of business — "Be a part of our $4 billion industry," for example — may have no bearing on your likelihood of success. Also, recognize that once you buy the business, you may be competing with franchise owners or independent business people with more experience than you.
  • Shop around. Compare franchises with other business opportunities. Some companies may offer benefits not available from the first company you considered.
  • Listen carefully to the sales presentation. Some sales tactics should signal caution. For example, if you are pressured to sign immediately "because prices will go up tomorrow," or "another buyer wants this deal," slow down. A seller with a good offer doesn't use high-pressure tactics. Get the seller's promises in writing. Any oral promises you get from a salesperson should be written into the contract you sign. If the salesperson says one thing but the contract says nothing about it or says something different, it's the contract that counts. If a seller balks at putting oral promises in writing, be alert to potential problems and consider doing business with another firm.
  • Consider getting professional advice. Ask a lawyer, accountant, or business advisor to read the disclosure document and proposed contract. The money and time you spend on professional assistance, and research — such as phone calls to current owners — could save you from a bad investment decision.

In representation of a new franchisor I have recently been on the other end of this investigation process. But it is clear to me that a good franchisor will not discourage you from conducting due diligence.  You should be very wary of high pressure sales tactics.  Don't be in a hurry.

 

The Workplace is All a Twitter

Twitter is one of the hottest social networking tools. President-elect Barack Obama even used it during his recent campaign. But is it a good idea to allow Twitter in the workplace?

Read my post on IowaBiz to learn more.

Rush On Business Honored with Iowa Web Awards

I am excited to announce that Rush on Business has been honored as the Best Business Blog and Best Resource Blog in the Iowa Web Awards for 2008.  Since I started this blog in March of 2006,  I wanted to do my part to improve the public image of lawyers.  My strong sense of purpose is to educate and provide information to business people in a way that helps them identify legal issues and make more informed choices about what legal services they need.  The collaborative process of a law blog (or any blog) can allow this to happen.

I am grateful to receive the awards.  I want to thank 48Web Consulting for its work in forming the Iowa Web awards and also Daniel Shipton of ImpromptuStudio for hosting the awards ceremony.  It was a great evening at IgniteDesMoines last night.

Thanks to all that support this blog.  

Insurance for Employee Lawsuits: Don't Forget to Check Coverage

Good article on IowaBiz regarding insurance for employee lawsuits.  Most businesses would be smart to explore this type of insurance coverage, especially in today's slumping economy.

I think many small businesses are under the mistaken believe that they are covered for employment lawsuits through their ordinary business liability coverage. This is usually not the case.  You will need to purchase a specific policy relating to employer practices in order to be covered. In addition, employer practices liability insurance policies vary greatly so be sure to carefully review the covered items with your insurance agent and lawyer.  Find a policy that provides comprehensive coverage.

Des Moines Franchise Case: All About the Trees

Week one in the Des Moines Franchise Case is in the books. Looks like the trial will last another couple of weeks. In the first week several city council members and officials testified but the bottom line is that this case boils down the the experts and the trees.

As discussed in my previous post, the central issue of the trial is to determine if the franchise fees charged by the city are in fact reasonably related to the City's administrative expenses. In an effort to defend its administrative expenses, the city argues that it costs about $19.6 million per year to regulate utilities in public rights of way. Much of this allegedly comes from improper tree trimming causing more than $4 million in damage each year to trees along 800 miles of streets.

The plaintiff challenged the validity of the number of the trees and also presented expert testimony from an arborist who testified that he could not follow the city's tree survey and found substantially less trees in the public right of way.

For more read this article from the Des Moines Register