Rush on Business You Tube Channel on the Air!

I am pleased to announce that I now have a Rush on Business You Tube Channel where I'll post short videos on various aspects of business and franchise law. I have a few videos posted so far and I'll add content weekly.

New videos include:

Should You Include Your Spouse When Forming a Small Business LLC?

Where Should Iowa Residents Incorporate or Form an LLC for their Small Business?

If there is a topic you think would be interesting, please let me know!

Employers & Social Media: NLRB 2nd Report Concerning Social Media

Jon Hyman wrote on his Ohio Employer's Law Blog that the NLRB has issued a 2nd report on social media as protected concerted activity.  If you are an employer considering discipline or termination of an employee resulting from social media activity you need to be very careful. Jon points out:

This report underscores that employees’ use of social media to discuss the workplace and work-related issues, and the impact of business’s social media policies on those discussions, remains at or near the top of the NLRB’s priorities. Because the NLRB is taking such an interest in this area, employers act at their peril if they discipline or discharge an employee for social media activities, or roll out a social media policy, without the advice and input of counsel well-versed on these issues.

Bottom line:  Discipline of employees making disparaging comments about your company through blogs, Facebook, Twitter and other sites could land you in trouble. You should read the report of the acting NLRB general counsel. It's one thing to have rules that prohibit plainly egregious conduct through the use of social media but be VERY cautious if have rules trying to curb what employees can say about your company. 

A Post I Wish I Had Written: For All the Clients that Hate Lawyers

Over the last 5 years that I have been writing this blog, there haven't been many Iowa business lawyers who write a blog on a regular basis. But when I was looking at Mike Colwell's Startup Models site, I noticed a new blog from business lawyer Chris Sackett of Brown Winick called BizB4Law.

Chris wrote a post I wish I had written called I Like Clients Who Don't Like Lawyers.  Chris says,

This post, of course, runs the risk of offending lawyers, but I suppose the whole premise is that lawyers need to get over themselves and think like the business people who are their clients.

Well said. It's a super post. Check it out.

If you're working on a business plan or financial model for your startup business, be sure to check out Startup Models too. It could save you a lot of time, expense and effort.

Wage and Hour Misclassification Costs Oracle $35 million

In my experience, wage and hour issues are often misunderstood by employers. Employers often treat employees as "exempt" in order to avoid paying the overtime owed to "non-exempt" employees. As a plaintiff's attorney said in one of my previous blog posts on the subject:

"I can hit a company with a hundred sexual harassment lawsuits, and it will not inflict anywhere near the damage that [a wage and hour suit] will."

A post from the California Injury Attorneys Blog discusses a recent settlement in which Oracle ageed to pay $35 million for employee wage and hour misclassification. As discussed in the post wage and hour misclassification cases often are class actions which result in large sums paid by Defendant employers.

For more information see my tips for avoiding wage and hour lawsuits.

Social Media Legal Policies & Training Workshops

One of the things I love the most is providing proactive educational workshops to companies and other organizations.  Due to the ever-growing interest in the topic, I am pleased to announce that I am now offering a new legal training workshop for businesses, large and small, regarding social media. A custom workshop will be designed for your business to cover the following topics:

  • Overview of Social Media, New Developments and the Future
  • The Use of Social Media in the recruiting and hiring process
  • Balancing Employee privacy v. Employer's Business Interests
  • The risks and benefits of Employees using Social Media in the workplace
  • What every supervisor needs to know about the use of social media
  • How (or whether) to discipline employees for Social Media use
  • Social Media and its impact on Litigation
  • Social Media Train Wrecks
  • Summary of Social Media Case Law Developments 
  • Drafting the Social Media policy 

To tailor the presentation specifically for your organization, we will send you a questionnaire in advance regarding your organization's and employees' use of social media and your existing policies and procedures.  Every company is different and the presentation will be designed to address your organization's specific issues, size, level of understanding and industry. Like other forms of employment based training, not only can social media legal training help you in the event you get pulled into litigation, but even more importantly, it can help prevent costly litigation and the loss of employee productivity.

Social media presents unprecedented opportunities and challenges for your business. It is essential that your executives, supervisors and employees stay informed about this ever-changing and important topic. For more information on social media legal training workshops and fees, please feel free to contact me at rush.nigut@brickgentrylaw.com.

 

Alternative to Employee Equity and Stock Options

With emerging companies I am often asked about equity and stock options for employees. That process is often complicated and costly. Usually the reason I hear favoring the equity / options approach is that employers want their employees to "feel like they are a part of something." An admirable goal ineed but are equity /options necessary to achieve this goal?

Mike Colwell of the BIZ recently referenced on his blog a post by Jason Fried of 37 Signals. I highly recommend you read Fried's post on "An Alternative to Employee Options / Stock Grants." 

The BIZ also ended its Dream Big Grow Here regional contest for Central Iowa this past week. The big winner was Real Estate Fan Pages and its owner, Matthew Smith.

 

NotifyWorks Launches Web Site

Our new startup company, Notifyworks, Inc. has officially launched its Web site today. You can check it out at www.notifyworks.com. The site also contains a blog which will cover client relations and legal technology issues.

Notifyworks is a software system that allow you to set up proactive notifications to clients that are timed to automatically go out in advance of important dates and deadlines.

Be sure to check out the video on our home page and whatever you do, "Don't be Dick!"

NLRB to Require Posters Regarding Union Rights

Once a mainstay of this blog, I have not written about employment law for quite some time. Since my franchise law practice has grown over the past few years, I've left it to Matt Brick from Brick Gentry to handle employment law issues in the office.  On the blogging side there are many great employment law blogs to follow including Daniel Schwartz of the Connecticut Law Blog and Jon Hyman of the Ohio Employer's Law Blog. Their blogs are terrific resources for anyone interested in employment law.

Another employment law blog that has come on the scene is the Iowa Employment Law Blog written by Patrick Smith of Des Moines. I've known Patrick for years and his blog is also one you can trust for up-to-date content on employment issues.

But the reason I am writing on employment law in this post is because all employers should definitely be aware of a new National Relations Labor Board (NLRB) rule that requires nearly EVERY private sector employer to post notices about their rights to unionize.  While there is some debate over whether the NLRB has the right to require the postings, the rule will go into effect on November 14, 2011. The failure to do so could result in an unfair labor practice. I am sure this would be quite the surprise for most small (or even large) businesses.

For more information, see the postings by Jon and Patrick on the topic.

Beware of Personal Guaranty on Business Charge Card

Earlier this week I applied for a charge card for my new business. As a part of the application, I was informed that I would need to personally guarantee charges, not only for my card, but also the cards of any other people under the account. Fortunately, this did not come as a surprise because I had already seen this bite unsuspecting business owners and/or executives in the past through my law practice.

In one instance I represented the vice-president of a company who was a part of a four-person management team. The vice-president was the named account holder but he thought the other members of the company's management team were equally liable for the debts on the account. Not so. So when the company folded, the charge card company had his personally guarantee but not the personal guarantee of the other members of the management team. Naturally, the charge card company pursued only the vice-president for the debt.

In another instance, an office manager (yes, an office manager) was pursued by a charge card company for BUSINESS expenses charged when the owner of the business died without adequate funds in his estate to pay for the debts. We argued no personal guaranty existed and that the office manager had never agreed to the terms on the account but the fact that charge card company pursued her cost her legal expenses and much aggravation. 

So beware of personal guarantees on charge cards. You may be accepting more personal liability than you suspect. Always inquire when applying for a new card and make sure you understand the extent of your personal liability.

Brick Gentry Webinar: Changes to Iowa Employment Law and Legislation

Matt Brick has a super webinar on our Brick Gentry Web site on the Changes to Iowa Employment Law and Legislation. Employment law is a constantly shifting area of the law that has serious consequences for employers, even when making a good faith mistake. Matt's presentation covers important developments in employment law for both public and private employers in Iowa.

Want to hear a Webinar on a particular legal topic? Let us know what you would like to know more about.

The Use Of Independent Contractors and Immigration

I often received questions about whether a worker should be classified as an independent contractor or employee. In fact a blog post on Employees v. Independent Contractors is still one of the most popular posts ever on my blog even though I wrote it over three years ago.

In a couple of recent blog posts, Brick Gentry immigration lawyer, Austin Kennedy, explores the use of independent contractors by companies hoping not to verify the employment authorization of a worker and whether this practice could lead to liability. His posts are worth a read. 

See links below:

Does an Employer Have to Verify the Employment Authorization of Independent Contractors?

When can an Employer's Use of Subcontractors Still Lead to Liability?

Brick Gentry Lawyer Austin Kennedy Presents Immigration Webinar

Listen and watch the premiere Brick Gentry, P.C. webinar from immigration lawyer Austin Kennedy on our new Brick Gentry Web site. Austin's presentation is on Achieving Lawful Permanent Residency in the United States Through the Labor Certification Process.

We are currently in the process of developing presentations on franchise and LLC issues. Register for our Webinars and receive updates on when new webinars are completed. Let us know if there is a topic you are interested in and we'll consider a webinar for it.

 

Noncompete Agreements: Stopping Former Employee From Soliciting May Not Protect Business

In drafting noncompete agreements, employers and their lawyers often drafting language that prohibits a former employee from soliciting the customers or clients of the employer. The problem is this language often does not go far enough to protect the former employer.

This scenario occurred in a recent case we handled for an employee. He was prohibited from soliciting the customers of the former employer. The question bolied down to whether the employee solicited a former customer by accepting employment with the former customer.

Although there were other factors bearing on the case, the court ruled that responding to an employment advertisement was not a solicitation that would prohibit the former employee from working with the former customer.

This same situation has occurred in circumstances where a former customer of an employer initiates contact with a former employee rather than the former employee initiating the sales contact with the customer. In those instances, if your noncompete agreement merely prohibits solicitation, your business will not likely receive the protection it desires and the employee may be permitted by a court to work with that customer.

The better approach is to indicate in your agreement that the former employee may not become employed by, work with, or accept business from the former customer in any way. Just like a coin there are two sides to worry about: 1) the former employee's actions; and 2) the former customer's actions. A prohibition against the employee's solicitation only protects 1/2 of the coin.

Brick Gentry Legal Webinars Coming Soon

I am really pleased to report that we have made significant progress on Brick Gentry's legal Webinars. We hope to have them up and running within the next couple of months. My first Webinar will be on franchise due dligence. 

Keep a look out for our new Brick Gentry Web site developed by CreateWowMarketing. With any luck it will be up and running before the end of this coming week.

Impact of Healthcare Reform on Business

On March 23, 2010, President Barack Obama signed the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“PPACA”), as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 into law. This new law changes the provision of healthcare in the United States more than any recent legislation. The impact and implementation of this new law will take place over the next several years. This blog post (prepared by my partner, Paul Drey of Brick Gentry, P.C.) highlights the significant changes resulting from this law, the implementation or effective date of the change, and the potential impact on your business. Please be aware that many of these changes call for rules and regulations to be created so as to fully implement the change. These rules and regulations are still being drafted in many cases, and only after their approval will one really understand the full impact of this new law. In the interim, we hope you find this blog post helpful as you prepare for these changes. (For full details and the specific impact on your business, please be sure to consult your business attorney, accountant or other advisor).

Reform that occurred immediately upon enactment:

  • Retroactive to January 1, 2010, a new tax credit would cover up to 50% of small businesses’ healthcare premium costs for up to two years; more specifically, the tax credit would apply to companies with fewer than 25 employees and average wages of no more than $50,000 (a recent report from Families USA and Small Business Majority, a business advocacy group, showed that 51,100 Iowa businesses would be eligible) [under the law, two half-time workers count as one full-time worker];
  • Grandfathered status of a current policy may allow for the addition or deletion of a new employee and any new dependents or changes resulting from a collective bargaining agreement only (however, most provisions apply to all policies, including grandfathered policies); and
  • Access to insurance for uninsured individuals with a pre-existing condition.

Reform that occurs in 2010:

 

  • Insurers will be barred from excluding children 19 and under from coverage because of a pre-existing condition;
  • Group plans and individual plans must allow young adults to stay on their parents’ coverage until the age of 26 instead of 19 (through 2014 grandfathered group plans only need to cover dependents who do not have another source of coverage);
  • Lifetime coverage limits will be eliminated and annual limits will be restricted;
  • Insurance companies will be barred from dropping people when they get sick;
  • Group plans will not be able to discriminate in favor of highly compensated individuals within six months of enactment;
  • Temporary reinsurance for early retirees over age 55;
  • For businesses employing more than 50 workers, health coverage rescissions will be prohibited except for fraud or intentional misrepresentation;
  • Employers must provide nursing mothers a private space available during working hours for breast-feeding or expressing milk;
  • Grants may be available for small employers who provide wellness programs to their employees; and
  • Group and individual plans will need to cover specific preventive care services.

Reform that occurs in 2011:

  • Medicare beneficiaries will be able to get an annual free wellness visit and personalized prevention plan service;
  • New expanded tax requirements on business owners;
  • Small employers (with less than 100 workers) may adopt new “simple cafeteria plans”;
  • New health plans will be required to cover preventive services with little or no cost to patients;
  • Employers would be required to enroll employees in a new national long-term care program, unless the employee opts out; and
  • Employers will be required to disclose the value of health benefits on employees’ W-2 tax forms.

Reform that occurs in 2012:

  • Provision to insureds who are enrolling or re-enrolling in a health plan of a summary of benefits and an explanation of coverage that is no more than four pages long;
  • Annual submission of reports with information concerning health outcomes (HHS is still establishing the details of this submission);
  • Encouragement of “Accountable Care Organizations”; and
  • Incentive program to improve the quality outcomes of acute care hospitals.

Reform that occurs in 2013:

  • Pilot program on bundling of medical services to encourage doctors, hospitals, and other care providers to better coordinate patient healthcare;
  • Threshold for claiming un-reimbursed medical expenses on itemized tax returns will be raised to 10% of AGI from 7.5% of AGI;
  • Medicare payroll tax will be raised to 2.35% from 1.45% for individuals earning more than $200,000 and married couples with incomes over $250,000;
  • Annual contribution limit for the FSA goes from $5,000 to $2,500, with an annually indexed cap for future years;
  • Auto-enrollment of new workers for businesses of more than 200 workers into an employer-sponsored health plan (unclear as to the actual effective date for this requirement); and
  • Employers will need to provide notice to all employees of the state-based exchanges that will be available in 2014.

 

Reform that occurs in 2014:

  • State-based health insurance exchanges and Small Business Health Option Program (“SHOP”) exchanges for small businesses and individuals will open no later than January 1, 2014 (business with less than 100 workers would be eligible);
  • Most people will be required to have health insurance or pay a fine;
  • Health plans will no longer be able to exclude people from coverage due to pre-existing conditions;
  • Prohibitions on discrimination based on health status;
  • Expansion in wellness programs and incentives for businesses;
  • Free-choice voucher program for workers commences;
  • For businesses with waiting periods for coverage for new workers, the waiting period cannot exceed ninety days;
  • Employers with 50 or more workers who do not offer health coverage will face a fine of $2,000 per employee if any worker received subsidized insurance on the exchange. (The first thirty employees are not counted for purposes of the fine.); and
  • Employers with 50 or more workers who do offer health coverage and have at least one worker whom received subsidized insurance will pay the lesser of $3,000 for each of the workers receiving the subsidy or $2,000 for each worker total.

Reform that occurs in 2015:

  • Incentive programs promoting and rewarding quality of care rather than quantity of services.

Reform that occurs in 2016:

  • In general, an excise tax on high cost employer-provided plans will be imposed. The first $27,500 of a family plan and $10,200 for an individual plan will be exempt from the tax; and
  • Businesses with more than 100 workers may be allowed to purchase coverage through the state exchanges (SHOP).

Reform that occurs in 2018:

  • Proposed Cadillac tax goes into effect.
  • By 2019, PPACA is estimated to provide an additional 32 million Americans access to basic healthcare insurance. The expected cost is now estimated to be $938 billion, a number which many expect to be higher.

 

A big thanks to Paul for all his hard work on preparing the information contained in this post. If you have questions or would like additional information regarding the impact of healthcare reform on your business, please contact Paul Drey at paul.drey@brickgentrylaw.com or at 515-274-1450. 

PorticoHR Social Media & Human Resources Seminar

I am looking forward to speaking on June 9th at the PorticoHR Social Media & Human Resources Seminar. Should be a fun panel with pulic relations and social media strategist Claire Celsi and Sam Mandolfo of LinkedIn also speaking.

PorticoHR is a provider of temporary and direct-hire staffing in Central Iowa. It is owned by Katie Roth who has over 25 years in the industry. She is quite an entreprenuer in her own right, having been selected as a finalist for the Ernst & Young Entrepreneur of the Year in 2001.

 

Largest Gender Discrimination Verdict a Whopper!

Mark Toth of the Manpower Employment Law Blog has a post on the largest gender discrimination verdict in history.

Be sure to check Mark's post. It's a whopper!

Also, from time to time, Mark has free employment law webinars. His next webinar is May 26th.  You can't beat the price!

Mandatory Paid Sick Leave in Iowa?

A bill in the Iowa Senate could require all businesses to provide paid sick leave to their employees.  My gut tells me many small businesses cannot afford to provide paid sick leave.

What do you think? 

Wage and Hour Lawsuits: Your Business Could Be Next

A couple of years ago I touched on how wage and hour lawsuits were on the rise. Since then Iowa's own Casey's General Stores got tagged for $11.7 million in a settlement.  But not even I could have predicted the potential $1,000,000,000 liability that AT&T allegedly faces for failure to pay overtime. Yep, that's a BILLION dollar claim!

Naturally that kind of pie in the sky number might leave one to think, "It's never going to happen to me, my business is much smaller and I won't be a target." But when you look at the fact that experts believe approximately 70 percent of businesses are out of compliance with wage and hour laws, you shouldn't be quick to shrug off the prospects of a process server knocking on your door. All it takes is one disgruntled employee to contact the Iowa Workforce Development or the Department of Labor and you could find yourself in the middle of a wage and hour dispute.

So what are some helpful tips to avoid wage and hour lawsuits? (The outline below is from an earlier post.  The comments from some prominent employment attorneys are especially good).

 

  • Conduct a Wage and Hour Review.  Your first step should be to get with an employment law attorney or other wage and hour/human resources specialist who can review your pay practices to determine whether you are in compliance with the law.  The cost spent for a review and developing a compliance program could save you tens of thousands of dollars in the long run or perhaps even millions if you run a large company. 
  • Train Managers.  Making sure managers understand the rules is paramount.  Managers can avoid costly mistakes and spot problems before they become too costly.
  • Think Exempt-Non Exempt, Not Just Salary - Hourly.  Too many employers pay employees a salary and then believe that relieves them from any obligation to pay overtime.  Employees need to make sure those employees are properly classified as exempt (someone who is typically not paid overtime) or non-exempt (someone that is generally entitled to overtime).
  • Take Complaints on Wage Issues Seriously.  You want to treat wage and hour complaints just as seriously as employment issues including harassment or discrimination.  In fact, these wage and hour lawsuits could be more costly to your business.
  • Do Not Retaliate.  Never, never, never retaliate against someone that makes a complaint for wage and hour issues.
  • Develop strong policies on pay practices and employee hours.  Make sure employees work those hours assigned and do not work off-the-clock.  Above all, properly document the number of hours worked because just like in baseball where a tie goes to the runner - if the employer has not documented the hours worked by the employee - the benefit of the doubt will go to the employee. 

 

 

Social Networking Law Blog Sure to Be Busy

Megan Erickson of the Dickinson Law Firm has started Erickson's Blog on Social Networking and the Law.  Now that's a blog that will have a never ending flow of posts.  She already has an interesting array of posts including one where a business owner got slapped with a $2 million libel lawsuit for Facebook and Twitter posts.

This is one blog I'll be sure to follow.