The Electronic Discovery Blog of K & L Gates has an informative post on a recent electronic discovery decision out of the Northern District of Georgia. 

In the case the court found that deleted emails were not reasonably accessible and the defendant had no duty to search backup tapes for emails of a sexual nature.

Lessons from this decision:

  1. DIscovery requests for emails should be relevent, specific and limited by time, sender and recipient.
  2. Following a written document retention and destruction schedule can prevent spoilation sanctions.
  3. Plaintiffs should request company-wide email perservation and not rely solely on the fact litigation has commenced.  Requests should also include the names of individuals from whom you want the emails.
  4. If the costs of retrieving emails on backup tapes are too high, judges are reluctant to order production.

Read the entire decision here.

 

This past year I covered in detail the Iowa-Microsoft class action case which settled for $179.95 million.  The case involved allegations that Microsoft undercut competitors and acted illegally.  Real bad stuff if you believed the plaintiffs.

Now a new controversy has developed in the Hawkeye state involving Microsoft.

Last night, I saw an attack against Governor Chet Culver.  At first I though it couldn’t be possible because Culver is not up for re-election until 2010.  But it all came together when the voice over said, "Tell Governor Culver that Iowans deserve a tax break, NOT MICROSOFT."

A new law will provide Microsoft tax breaks for a proposed server farm if the company invests $200 million and makes a decision by the end of the year.

My question is whether that is a new $200 million or does the company get a credit for the $179.95 million paid in the settlement?  This is typical Iowa.  It just wouldn’t be nice and fair if Iowans picked Microsoft’s pockets for $179.95 million and didn’t give them anything in return.  And above all, we Iowans are nice and fair. 

 

Brian Honnold of Professional Solutions Insurance Services shares important information on IowaBiz that every retailer should know about their insurance coverage when you build out your new retail space in your local mall or strip center.

If you don’t fully check out your coverages chances are you will be sorry.

 

 

As disclosed in the last post the new amended FTC rule concerning franchise disclosure documents requires franchisors to update their UFOC by no later than July 1, 2008.  After July 1, 2008, franchisors must comply with the new FTC rule only.  Currently, franchisors may comply with either the former rule or the new rule.

Here are some key differences between the former rule and the new rule:

  • Use of unaudited financial statements.  Start-up franchisors may phase-in the use of audited financial statements.  In this case the franchisor must clearly and conspicuously disclose that the franchise has not been in business for three or more years and cannot include all required financial statements.  (There may still be requirements to submit audited opening balance sheets in registration states).  Franchisees should make sure to review the financials carefully as always.
  • Financial Statements.  The FTC will allow the use of financial statements prepared according to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP").  There must be separate audited financial statements for any parent that "commits to perform post-sale obligations for the franchisor or guarantees the franchisor’s obligations" in the disclosure document.
  • No Broker Disclosures.  The Amended FTC rule eliminates the broker disclosure requirement.  However, the broker will need to be listed on the Receipt Page because the Receipt Page requires the franchisor to identify all "franchise sellers".
  • Litigation.  Franchisors will be required to disclose material franchisor-initiated litigation against its franchisees.  The rule will be more lenient as a franchisor will only have to disclose actions that the franchisor filed during its last fiscal year – not the last 10 years. Further,  a full description of the case will not be necessary.  If a counterclaim is filed against a franchisee the disclosure will need to be treated as any other franchisee-initiated action and the regular, full disclosure will be required.  (Franchisees will need to more fully investigate whether franchisor-initiated litigation occurred whether it is in the disclosure document or not).
  • Financial Performance Representations.  The new rule encourages franchisors to provide financial performance representations but it is still voluntary.  Franchisors may provide a more detailed cost and expense analysis which could be helpful for prospective franchisees.  Also, franchisors may provide financial representations based upon a subset that shares the same characteristics. 

There are other differences so be sure to talk with an attorney experienced in franchise matters if you are looking at purchasing a franchise.

 

Interested in franchising your business and have an extra 36 minutes? 

You may want to listen to this informative podcast on AllBusiness featuring franchise lawyers Julie Lusthaus and Warren Lewis discuss the pitfalls of the Franchise Disclosure Document (formerly known as the UFOC).

The new amended FTC rule concerning franchise disclosure documents requires franchisors to update their UFOC by no later than July 1, 2008.  After July 1, 2008, franchisors must comply with the new FTC rule only.  Currently, franchisors may comply with either the former rule or the new rule.

Stay tuned for the next post on some of the differences between the new franchise disclosure document and the UFOC.

The Department of Labor recently released new proposed regulations concerning the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA).  Since the proposed regulations are 477 pages, it is nice that Ohio employment lawyer Jon Hyman has provided a excellent overview.

Jon simply has one of most informative employment law blogs around.  Here are his highlights of the new regulations:

Except in emergency situations, employees will be required to follow the employer’s policy for notification of FMLA leave, eliminating employees’ ability under the old regulations to take up to 2 days after an absence begins to notify their employer that they intend to take FMLA leave. This change will greatly improve employers’ ability to plan and schedule around employees’ medical leaves.

  • Employers will be able to directly contact employees’ doctors when employers have questions about FMLA medical certification forms that the doctors have filled out. Employers will no longer have to go through the employee as an intermediary, or retain their own doctor to contact the employee’s doctor. While this change may have some effect on employee privacy, it will greatly improve the flow of information and streamline the ability of employers to make proper decisions based on full and complete medical information. This rule will also eliminate the expense and burden of companies having to retain their own doctors simply to ensure that a form is properly filled out.
  • To employers’ dismay, the regulations do not change the time increments in which employees can take intermittent leave, but do require that an employee using intermittent leave use the employer’s regular call in procedure except in emergencies. Thus, employees will still be able to take intermittent leave in very short increments, continuing for employers the administrative nightmare of intermittent leave, albeit with some additional notice.
  • Employers will be entitled to require employees to obtain certification of FMLA-eligible medical conditions twice a year instead of annually.
  • Currently, the clock under which employees accrue their 12 months of service for eligibility has no time limit, even after multiple breaks of service. Thus, if I work for 6 months for a company, and return 10 years later, I am eligible for FMLA leave after another 6 months. The new regulations place a 5-year cap on years of service for calculating eligibility, except for military or childrearing leaves, or where rehiring is covered by a collective bargaining agreement.

Please note that I often find many small employers mistakenly believe they are subject to the FMLA regulations.  Generally, the FMLA covers employers with 50 or more employees, and employees must have worked for the employer for 12 months and for 1,250 hours of service during the previous year to be eligible for FMLA leave.  So be sure not to create a situation where you are responsible for FMLA leave if you are not required to do so.

As always, seek the advice of an employment lawyer in your particular situation.

flickr photo by mahalie

My reign as the host of Blawg Review is coming to an end.  But never fear, Brett is here!

Next week Mr. Trout keeps the Blawg Review right here in the great state of Iowa.  I guess we will find out whether patent attorneys really do have all the fun.

As for me, I’ll get back to some regular business law related posts next week. 

Welcome to a RAGBRAI inspired Blawg Review.  What is RAGBRAI?  The Register’s Annual Great Bicycle Ride Across Iowa is an annual seven-day ride across the state.  Heading into its 36th year, RAGBRAI is the longest, largest and oldest touring bicycle ride in the world.  It’s not a race.  It’s an experience.   And since Blawg Review is a carnival, nothing says carnival in an uniquely Iowa way like bicycles, spandex, pork chops, pie, frivolity and 10,000 of your closest friends!

The weather in Iowa is frigid this winter.  As the weekend of this Blawg Review approaches Iowans brace for another heavy snow.  Our friend Charlie Longbrief looks at the floor below his stationary bike and dreams of summer.  A person can stand only so many YMCA spinning classes.  He thinks back to his first RAGBRAI as a twenty year old when law school hadn’t yet entered his mind and the biggest celebrity on the ride was Oakland Raiders great and Miller Lite spokeman Ben Davidson.  Now it’s nothing to see the likes of lawyer turned politician John Edwards or the bicycling legend himself, Lance Armstrong.  Armstrong may have participated in the famous New York City Marathon but his heart will always belong with RAGBRAI.  Listen for yourself:

https://youtube.com/watch?v=BtbNk0CoZ20%26rel%3D1

Day 1:  Missouri Valley to Harlan  – 58 miles

This year’s ride starts in the river town of Missouri Valley.  While performing the traditional dip of his back tire in the Missouri River, Charlie sees Liz Overton of the Iowa Law Blog who warns him that because of the $350,000 settlement in a 2004 RAGBRAI death bicyclers better beware of the new proposed legislation from the Iowa State Association of Counties.

Unfazed Charlie gets on his bike and sets out on his adventure.  But as he rides off he does ask himself whether Mad Kane is right.  Is it wise to travel with friends particularly where tents are involved?

About 15 miles down the road Charlie takes a break and starts getting an earful from New Yorker Eric Turkewitz about how State Farm has been hit with a RICO lawsuit over alleged sham medical exams.  That hasn’t been reported elsewhere and Charlie worries whether State Farm might be doing the same thing in Iowa.  Charlie is so interested he and Eric ride the rest of the way to Harlan together.  Although its only the first day Turkewitz remarks that he agrees with Lance Armstrong . . . RAGBRAI is a hell of lot more fun than his beloved New York City Marathon.

As he pulls into Harlan, Charlie finds himself a little short on cash and heads off to find an ATM.  There he sees John Crenshaw who starts telling him about the biggest scams banks are pulling off everyday. Charlie just shakes his head in agreement as he pays the $2.00 charge to get the money out of the ATM.  After a little angel hair pasta its time to hit the sleeping bag.  There is a big week ahead and unfortunately Charlie isn’t twenty any longer.

Day 2:  Harlan to Jefferson – 83 miles

The next morning Charlie wakes up bright and early and sets off for Jefferson.  He has some clients that are buying a business nearby and that reminds him he should heed Larry Staton Jr.’s advice to know what you are getting when you buy a trademark from an existing business.

About half way to Jefferson our city boy is a little mesmerized by the miles and miles of corn.  It makes him wonder whether Farmer David will be able to pay that large patent judgment he now owes Monsanto as reported by the Patent Baristas.

In Scranton, just short of Jefferson, Charlie sees a big group of people gathered in a park off the town’s main drag.  There he sees Dan Slater of the WSJ Law Blog who explains that all the hoopla is because the M & M boys have turned their attention to the RAGBRAI water slides because the Naked Cowboy drove them outta of Dodge.  The revelers love it and the log jam causes a very slow ride into Jefferson that evening.

Day 3:  Jefferson to Ames – 56 miles

It’s a big day for politicians on the way to Ames, home of Iowa State University.  Barack Obama and John McCain are expected to make appearances today.  Hillary Clinton is here too and keeps talking about how the Florida and Michigan delegates must count.  Obama shrugs it off by saying even his six year old knows it wouldn’t be fair to count votes where there was no campaign.  But at least Florida has made significant strides in improving its jury system according to Juries.  While Diane Levin points out voters can learn a lot from the field of negotiation.  Eugene Volokh shares that John Mellencamp may be able to stop McCain from playing his songs after all.

All the political talk has people addressing serious issues on the road today.  Riding on a three person tandum, Leon Gettler of Sox First tells Charlie that Sarbanes-Oxley not only failed to stop the subprime meltdown, it contributed by giving investors the false confidence that they could rely on the law, and not prudence to protect their market holdings.  Scott Greenfield shares that Congress has a pending bill that may immunize banks from paying billions in dollars to a small Plano, Texas company.  Patently-O adds that although DataTreasury is not directly mentioned in the bill it is pretty clear that Section 14 is directed primarily at the company. 

As Charlie rides into Ames he sees Kevin O’Keefe and  Holden Oliver of What About Clients engaged in a heated discussion about whether corporate clients really want a lawyer that blogs.  O’Keefe says yes while Oliver says no.  It then gets a little personal when O’Keefe accuses Oliver of being someone else.  Charlie blames Teri Rasmussen who started the whole thing when she said every client should want a lawyer who blawgs.

Day 4:  Ames to Tama-Toledo – 75 miles

Charlie gets ready to head off to Iowa’s version of the twin cities today.  In the pancake breakfast line he meets Connie Crosby who is kind enough to introduce him to David Bilinsky.  David tells Charlie all about how there is a great need for law firms to turn their senior partners into business leaders.  David Maister overhears them and chimes in that one-firm firms are often quite successful.

After an uneventful morning Charlie witnesses an accident on today’s route where someone goes to the hospital.  It looks like the rider will be okay but David Harlow of HealthBlawg warns that hospital-acquired infections are a real problem.  Iowa estate lawyer Matt Gardner says that even if the rider makes it through he should still think about the disposition of his bodily remains.

 As he enters Tama (or is it Toledo), John Phillips of the Word on Employment Law almost runs smack into a little beagle that darts in front of him.  The incident causes John to conclude that beagles should no longer be excluded from the Animal Employment Protection Act (AEPA).  John is obviously a little excited about the near miss and starts rambling about how he handled the situation a whole lot better than Roger Clemens handled the accusations from Brian McNamee.

Day 5:  Tama-Toledo to North Liberty – 82 miles

Now that we have passed the mid-way point for this year’s ride, everyone is a little loosey-goosey today.  Charlie’s cadence starts to pick up as the wind blows with the sweet smell of pork chops.  That could only mean that Mr. Pork Chop is nearby.  As he pulls off the roadside to visit our pork chop hero, Charlie sees that Iowa legal blogger extraordinaire Brett Trout and his band of Iowa legal bloggers are engaging Mr. Pork Chop in a battle of wills to determine who has the loudest pork chop call.  Sadly, while Trout may be Iowa’s toughest attorney he is no match for Mr. Pork Chop in this arena.  Hear why:

 

https://youtube.com/watch?v=hwWln354-YA%26rel%3D1

After a pork chop and a short nap Charlie rides along to catch up with Michael Moore who discusses risk management in employee terminations and explains sometimes the "How" is as important as the "Why".  Pretty soon both of them come across a big party along the roadside.  A crowd is gathered around Dennis Kennedy who apparently is still celebrating his blawgiversary and birthday.  During the party Tulane Law Professor Alan Childress wonders aloud whether any Iowa legal counselors had ever been in trouble like the lawyer that got into trouble with his state bar by trying to talk his way out of a ticket for deer hunting.

Still a little full from his banana cream pie, Charlie and his new friend Charles H. Green ride along at an easy pace discussing that as more and more banks and consumers walk away from loans–and contracts gone bad, we are reminded that legally binding contracts are often only as strong as the morality of those signing them.

That evening after dinner there is lots of entertainment in North Liberty.  At a concert Cathy Gellis proclaims, "I need a husband!"  The revelation causes Jon Hyman to explain what happens when office romances go bad.  But Cynthia Shapiro, who received her RAGBRAI pass from George’s Employment Blawg, says you might be able to have that office romance if you know a few secrets.  When Jennifer Jaskolka-Brown overhears them she warns them that email has made it much easier to collect damaging evidence in divorce cases.

Day 6:  North Liberty to Tipton – 62 miles

Charlie decides to join the Lance Armstrong peloton this morning for some fun.  As you might expect with Armstrong the ride is a little faster paced today.  There are several others brave enough to join the pack this morning:

 

Day 7: Tipton to LeClaire – 55 miles

The last day!  On his ride to LeClaire, Charlie meets up with the anonymous Editor of Blawg Review to tell him the ride has been worth it.  Together they dip their front tires into the Mississippi River where Charlie quips that normally what happens on RAGBRAI stays on RAGRBRAI, but this year what happens on RAGBRAI ends up on Blawg Review!

 * Legal Disclaimer:  This Blawg Review is a work of fiction.  Names, characters, places, events and incidents either are the product of the author’s imagination or are used fictitiously.  Any resemblance to actual persons, living or dead, events or locales is entirely coincidental.

Blawg Review has information about next week’s host, and instructions how to get your blawg posts reviewed in upcoming issues.  My dear friend and fellow Iowa legal blogger Brett Trout takes the helm next week.  We wish him well as he tries to best the excellence of his previous effort on Blawg Review #106.

————————–

 Flickr Photo Credits:  johnedwards2008, wade, blmurch, MNgilen, IaRuth, wade and artandscience

Next week I will be the host of Blawg Review.  Blawg Review is a blog carnival for anyone interested in law.  I encourage you to submit your posts or any recommendations for posts.  Please follow these submission guidelines. 

If you haven’t already done so or are unfamilar with Blawg Review, be sure to take a look at this week’s Blawg Review #146 from the Invent Blog.

I have already received some great submissions so I am looking forward to the fun. 

A .300 batting average may get you into Major League Baseball’s Hall of Fame but winning only 30 percent of your employment lawsuits won’t do the trick.

See Mark Toth’s Manpower blog for the results of the Question of the Week – What % of employment lawsuits are won by employers?  That’s right, only 30 percent.

But fortunately there are things an employer can do to increase their chances to win and/or avoid lawsuits.  Jon Hyman offers several suggestions for the proactive employer:

  1. Review and update handbooks, policy manuals and forms;
  2. Implement a document retention and destruction policy;
  3. Implement a harassment training program;
  4. Audit job descriptions and employee classification for wage and hour compliance;
  5. Properly document all performance problems.

photo on flickr by ewen and donabel